Practitioner's Corner
Lessons from the field—what we see building at scale
Practitioner's Corner
Lessons from the field—what we see building at scale
The Calibration Work That Never Stops
Every Monday morning, a pricing analyst opens a spreadsheet containing 150 randomly selected hotel rates. Her job: verify that automated extraction matches what's actually on the websites. She's been doing this for six months. The sample size has dropped from 300 to 150—but it will never reach zero. Why does automation that works still require human checking? The answer reveals what enterprises actually spend money on when web agents move from proof-of-concept to production.
The Calibration Work That Never Stops
Every Monday morning, a pricing analyst opens a spreadsheet containing 150 randomly selected hotel rates. Her job: verify that automated extraction matches what's actually on the websites. She's been doing this for six months. The sample size has dropped from 300 to 150—but it will never reach zero. Why does automation that works still require human checking? The answer reveals what enterprises actually spend money on when web agents move from proof-of-concept to production.
Fabien Vauchelles and the 195 Regional Problems Hidden in 'Global' Web Automation
Your pricing agent runs perfectly in testing. You deploy globally. Twelve countries work fine. Three return mysterious session failures. At 3am you discover that what looked like authentication timeouts is actually how Singapore's CDN handles bot detection differently than Tokyo's. Same code, same provider, completely different regional behavior.
The web behaves fundamentally differently across borders. Different CDNs, regional bot detection rules, localized rate limits, variant page structures. What looks like one scaling problem is actually hundreds of distinct regional challenges that most teams discover through production failures. One builder has spent a decade in this territory, building infrastructure that anticipates what breaks when you assume the web behaves consistently across geographies.
Fabien Vauchelles and the 195 Regional Problems Hidden in 'Global' Web Automation
Your pricing agent runs perfectly in testing. You deploy globally. Twelve countries work fine. Three return mysterious session failures. At 3am you discover that what looked like authentication timeouts is actually how Singapore's CDN handles bot detection differently than Tokyo's. Same code, same provider, completely different regional behavior.
The web behaves fundamentally differently across borders. Different CDNs, regional bot detection rules, localized rate limits, variant page structures. What looks like one scaling problem is actually hundreds of distinct regional challenges that most teams discover through production failures. One builder has spent a decade in this territory, building infrastructure that anticipates what breaks when you assume the web behaves consistently across geographies.
The Number That Matters
More than 70% of automation script failures are phantom failures. Tests report errors when the underlying functionality passed. A button moved three pixels. A modal animation took 50ms longer. The environment loaded fonts differently. The script breaks. The product works fine.
Watch what happens. Engineers investigate for hours, find nothing broken. They patch the script. Next week, different phantom failure. Maintenance becomes a full-time job. Teams stop trusting alerts. When most failures mean nothing, all failures mean nothing. You built automation to catch bugs faster. Instead you built a system that cries wolf professionally.
Practitioner Resources
